Demands of World vs
Christ
By Leo Tolstoy
Edited and Reprinted from What I Believe
Translated by Aylmer Maude
What I Believe was first circulated in Russia in 1884
and first printed in Geneva in 1888. Mr. Aylmer Maude's translation was first published
in 1921. Footnote references are designated by the following initials: A.M. - Aylmer
Maude, the translator; and P.R. - Paul Revere, Pastor.
Published in the Kingdom of Heaven
Year of Our Lord, 1991
20 pages |
Want your own
copy of this book?
Order this book today!
|
Introduction
The following article is
excerpted from What I Believe, by Leo Tolstoy. In his book, Tolstoy concludes that
it is absurd to believe we are masters of our lives. When we live only for our own joy, we
feel unhappy, just as laborers do when they do not fulfill their Master's orders. And when
we live only for our own enjoyment, death ruins all we work for. To live rationally, we
must live so that death cannot destroy life. To participate in the true life, we must
forgo our own will and do the will of the Father of life. For life to be a blessing, says
Tolstoy, we must identify ourselves with the Son of Man in the task of establishing the
kingdom of God on earth - here and now.
Paul Revere, Pastor
Demands of World vs Christ
Leo Tolstoy
Christ says that those who
follow him will be persecuted by those who do not listen to him, but he does not say that
the disciples will lose anything thereby; on the contrary, he says that his disciples will
have more of joy here in this world than those who do not follow him.
That Christ says and
thinks this is shown beyond possibility of doubt by the clearness of his words and the
drift of his whole teaching, as well as by his way of life and that of his disciples. But
is it true?
Examining the abstract
question whether the position of the disciples of Christ or of the disciples of the world
is the better, one cannot but see that the position of the disciples of Christ should be
better, because they, doing good to all men, would not evoke hatred. The disciples of
Christ, doing harm to no one, would only be persecuted by evil men, but the disciples of
the world would be persecuted by all, since the law of their life is the law of strife
- that is to say, the persecution one of another. The chances of suffering are the same
for these as for those, with only this difference, that Christ's disciples will be
prepared for the sufferings, but the world's disciples will employ all the powers of their
souls to escape them; and that Christ's disciples when suffering will think that the world
needs their sufferings, but the world's disciples when suffering will not know why they
suffer. Arguing in the abstract, the position of Christ's followers should be better than
that of those of the world. But is it so in reality?
To verify this let
everyone remember all the painful moments of his life, all the physical and spiritual
sufferings he has endured and still endures, and ask himself for what has he borne all
these misfortunes, for the sake of the world's teaching or for that of Christ's? Let every
sincere man remember well his whole life, and he will see that never, not once, has he
suffered from obeying the teaching of Christ, but that most of the misfortunes of his life
have come about because contrary to his own inclination he has followed the world's
teaching which constrained him.
In my own life,
exceptionally fortunate in a worldly sense, I can recall sufferings borne by me in the
name of the world's teaching which would be sufficient to supply a good Christian martyr.
All the bitterest moments of my life, from the drunkenness and debauchery of student-days,
the duels, war, and so on, to that ill-health and those unnatural and trying conditions of
life in which I now live - all this was martyrdom in the name of the world's teaching.
And I speak of my own
life, which is exceptionally fortunate in a worldly sense. But how many martyrs are there
who have endured and are now enduring, for the sake of the world's teaching, sufferings
which I cannot even vividly imagine to myself!
We do not see all the
difficulty and danger of obeying the world's teaching, merely because we consider that all
we endure for it is unavoidable.
We have assured ourselves
that all these misfortunes which we inflict on ourselves are necessary conditions of our
life, and therefore we are unable to grasp the fact that Christ teaches just how we
should free ourselves from these misfortunes and live happily.
To be in a condition to
discuss the question which life is happier, we should dismiss that false notion, if only
in thought, and look without prejudice within ourselves and around us.
Go among a large crowd of
people, especially townsfolk, and notice the wearied, distressed, sickly faces, and then
remember your own life and the lives of people about whom you have known; remember all the
violent deaths, all the suicides of which you have heard, and ask yourself for whose sake
was all this suffering, death, and suicidal despair? And you will see, strange as it at
first seems, that nine-tenths of these sufferings are endured for the sake of the world's
teaching, that all these sufferings are unnecessary and need not exist, and that the majority
of people are martyrs to the world's teaching.
Recently, one rainy autumn
Sunday, I went by tram through the Bazaar at the Sukharev Tower. For nearly half a mile
the car made its way through a dense crowd of people who immediately closed in again
behind it. From morning to night these thousands of people, of whom most are hungry and
ragged, swarm here in the dirt, scolding, cheating, and hating one another. The same thing
occurs in all the bazaars of Moscow. The evening is passed by these people in the
dram-shops and taverns, the night in their corners and hovels.1 It was
common for Moscow workmen to live in a corner of a room or passage, generally not even
screened off from the rest of the room in which other people, besides the owner and his
family, had other corners. - A.M. Sunday is the best day in their week. On
Monday, in their infected dens, they will again resume the work they detest.
Consider the life of all
these people in the positions they left to choose that in which they have placed
themselves, and remember the unceasing toil these people voluntarily endure - men and
women - and you will see that they are real martyrs.
All these people have left
their homes, fields, fathers, brothers, and often their wives and children, and have
abandoned everything, even their very lives, and have come to town to acquire that which
according to the teaching of the world is considered indispensable for each of them.
And they all - not to mention those tens of thousands of unfortunate people who have lost
everything and struggle along on garbage and vodka in the doss-houses2
places where a night's lodging may be had very cheaply - P.R. - they all,
from the factory hands, cabmen, seamstresses and prostitutes, to the rich merchants and
Ministers of State with their wives, endure the most trying and unnatural manner of life
and yet fail to acquire what, according to the teaching of the world, they need.
Search among these people
for a man, poor or rich, for whom what he earns secures what he considers necessary
according to the world's teaching, and you will not find one in a thousand. Everyone
struggles with his whole strength to obtain what he does not need, but what is demanded of
him by the teaching of the world and the absence of which therefore makes him unhappy.
And as soon as he obtains what is required, something else, and again something else, is
demanded of him, and so this work of Sisyphus3 In Greek mythology a
greedy king of Corinth doomed forever in Hades to roll uphill a heavy stone which always
rolled down again - P.R. continues endlessly, ruining the life of men.
Take the ladder of wealth
of people who spend from £30 to
£5,000 a year, and you will rarely find one who is not
tormented and worn out with work to obtain
£40 when he has
£30, and
£50 when he has
£40, and
so on endlessly. And there is not one who having
£50 would voluntarily exchange into the
way of life of one having
£40, or if there are such cases the exchange is made not to live
more easily, but to save money and hide it away. They all have to burden their already
overladen life more and more with work and to devote their life and soul entirely to the
service of the world's teaching. To-day I obtain a coat and galoshes, to-morrow a
watch and chain, after to-morrow a lodging with a sofa and a lamp, then carpets in the
sitting-room and velvet clothes, then race-horses and pictures in gilt frames, till
finally I fall ill from my excessive labours and die. Another continues the same labour
and also sacrifices his life to that same Moloch; he too dies and also does not know why
he did what he did. But perhaps the life itself during which a man does all this is happy?
Test that life by the
measure of what all men have always described as happiness and you will see that this life
is terribly unhappy. Indeed, what are the chief conditions of earthly happiness - those
which no one disputes?
Conditions of earthly happiness
One of the first
conditions acknowledged by everyone is that man's union with nature should not be
infringed - that is to say, that he should live under the open sky, in the light of
the sun and in the fresh air, in contact with the earth, with vegetation, and with
animals. All men have always considered that to be deprived of those things was a great
misfortune. Men confined in prison feel this deprivation more than anything else. But
consider the life of people who live according to the teaching of the world: the more they
achieve success according to the world's teaching the more are they deprived of this
condition of happiness. The higher they climb in the scale of worldly fortune the less
do they see of the light of the sun, of the fields and the woods, and of wild or domestic
animals. Many of them, almost all the women, live on to old age seeing the rising of
the sun only once or twice in their lives, and never seeing the fields and the woods
except from a carriage or a railway train, and not only without having sown or planted
anything, or fed or reared cows, horses, or hens, but without even having an idea of how
those animals are born, grow, and live. These people only see textiles, stone, and wood
shaped by human toil, and that not by the light of the sun but by artificial light. They
only hear the sounds of machines, vehicles, cannons, and musical instruments; they smell
scents and tobacco-smoke; under their feet and hands they have only textiles, stone, and
wood; for the most part, on account of their weak digestions, they eat highly-spiced food
that is not fresh. Their movements from place to place do not save them from these
deprivations. They move about in closed boxes. In the country and abroad, wherever they
go, they have the same textiles and wood under their feet, the same curtains hiding the
light of the sun from them, the same footmen, coachmen and porters depriving them of
contact with the earth, with plants, and with animals. Wherever they may be they are
deprived, like prisoners, of this condition of happiness. As prisoners console themselves
with a tuft of grass that grows in the prison yard, with a spider or a mouse, so these
people sometimes console themselves with puny indoor plants, a parrot, or a monkey, and
even these they do not themselves rear.
Another undoubted condition
of happiness is work; in the first place voluntary work which one is fond of, and
secondly physical work which gives one an appetite and sound, restful sleep. Again the
more good fortune people have secured according to the world's teaching, the more are they
deprived of this second condition of happiness. All the fortunate ones of the world, the
men in important places and the rich, either live like prisoners, quite deprived of work
and vainly struggling with diseases that arise from the absence of physical labour, and
still more vainly with the ennui which overcomes them (I say vainly, because work is only
joyous when it is undoubtedly needful - and they need nothing), or they do work they hate,
as bankers, public prosecutors, governors, or ministers, while their wives arrange
drawing-rooms, china, and costumes for themselves and their children. (I say hateful
because I have never yet met one of them who praised his occupation, or did it with even
as much pleasure as that with which a porter clears away the snow from before the house.)
All these fortunate people are either deprived of work or are burdened with work they
dislike - that is to say, they find themselves in the position in which prisoners are
placed.
The third indubitable
condition of happiness is a family. And again, the further people have advanced in
worldly success the less is that happiness accessible to them. Most of them are
adulterers, and consciously renounce the happiness of a family, submitting only to its
inconveniences. If they are not adulterers, still their children are not a joy to them but
a burden, and they deprive themselves of them, trying in every way - often by most
tormenting means - to make their marital unions barren. Or if they have children they are
deprived of the joy of intercourse with them. By their rules they have to hand them over
to strangers, for the most part quite alien people; first to foreigners,4
This is a reference to the common Russian practice of having a foreign nurse, governess,
or tutor for young children, that they may learn a foreign language in the nursery. - A.M.
and then to the Government instructors;5 The Russian schools are State
institutions. - A.M. so that their family only causes them grief, their
children from infancy becoming as unhappy as their parents and having only one feeling
towards their parents - a desire for their death in order to inherit their property.6
The defence of such a life that one often hears from parents is amazing. 'I want nothing',
say the parents; 'this kind of life is hard for me, but as I love my children I bear it
for their sakes.' That is to say, I know by undoubted experience that our life is unhappy,
and therefore . . . I educate my children so that they shall be as unhappy as I am. And
therefore, out of my love for them, I place them in the full physical and moral contagion
of a town; I hand them over to strangers who have only a mercenary aim in educating them;
and so physically, morally, and mentally I take pains to injure my children. And this
contention has to serve as justification for the irrational life the parents themselves
lead! - L.T. They are not shut up in prison, but the consequences of their
life in regard to their family, are more tormenting than the deprivation of family life to
which prisoners are exposed.
The fourth condition of
happiness is free, amicable intercourse with all the different people in the world.
And again, the higher the rank attained by men of the world the more are they deprived of
this chief condition of happiness: the higher, the narrower and the more restricted is the
group of people with whom it is possible for them to associate and the lower in mental and
moral development are the few people who form the enchanted circle from which there is no
escape. For a peasant and his wife intercourse is open with the whole world of mankind,
and if one million people do not wish to have intercourse with him he still has eighty
millions of people such as himself, labouring people with whom, from Archangel to
Astrakhan, without waiting for visits or introductions, he can at once enter into the
closest brotherly relations. For an official with his wife there are hundreds of people on
the same level as himself, but those above him do not receive him and those below him are
all separated from him. For a rich man of the world and his wife a few dozen worldly
families are accessible, all the rest are cut off from him. For a Minister of State, or a
millionaire, and his family, there are a single dozen similarly important or wealthy
people. For Emperors and Kings the circle is yet more restricted. Is not this a form of
imprisonment in which the prisoner can only have intercourse with two or three warders?
Finally, a fifth
condition of happiness is a healthy and painless death. And again, the higher people
stand on the social ladder the more are they deprived of this condition of happiness. Take
for example a moderately rich man and his wife and an average peasant and his wife:
notwithstanding all the hunger and excessive toil which, not by his fault but by the
cruelty of man, a peasant has to bear, you will see that the lower the healthier and the
higher the sicklier are men and women.
Count over in your memory
the rich men and their wives you have known or now know, and you will notice that most of
them are ill. Among them a healthy man, who is not undergoing treatment continually or
periodically summer after summer, is as much an exception as is a sick man among the
peasantry. All these fortunate people without exception, begin with onanism (which has
become in their class a natural condition of development), they all have bad teeth, are
all grey or bald at an age when a workman is just reaching his full strength. They are
nearly all subject to nervous, digestive, and sexual illnesses from gluttony, drunkenness,
debauchery, and doctoring, and those who do not die young spend half their life in being
doctored and taking injections of morphia, or are shrivelled cripples unfitted to live by
their own exertions and capable of existing only like parasites or like those ants who are
fed by slave-ants. Consider their deaths: this one shot himself; that one rotted with
syphilis; another old man died from the effects of a stimulant, while another died young
from a flogging to which he submitted in his desire for sex-stimulation; one was eaten
alive by lice, another by worms; one drank himself to death, another died of over-eating;
one from morphia, and another as the result of an abortion. They perish one after another
for the sake of the world's teaching. And the crowd throngs after them and seeks, like
martyrs, for suffering and destruction.
One life after another is
flung under the chariot-wheels of that god: the chariot passes on tearing them to pieces,
and more and more victims, with groans, cries, and curses, fall beneath it!
World's teaching more dangerous than Christ's
To fulfil the teaching of
Christ is hard! Christ says: 'Let him that would follow me leave house, and fields, and
brothers, and follow me in God's way, and he shall receive in this world a hundred times
more houses, fields, and brothers, and shall also gain eternal life.'7
Matthew 19:29 And no one follows him. But the teaching of the world
says: 'Abandon house, and fields, and brothers, and go from the village to the rotten
town. Live all your life as a naked bath-attendant soaping other people's backs amid the
steam, or serve in a money-changer's basement-office all your life counting other people's
pence; or live as a public prosecutor, spending your whole life in the courts over
law-papers and devoting yourself to making miserable people's fate yet worse; or as a
Minister of State, signing unnecessary papers in a hurry all your life; or as a colonel,
killing people all your life - live such a monstrous life as this, always ending in a
painful death, and you will neither gain anything in this world nor will you receive life
eternal.' And everyone follows this course. Christ said: 'Take up your cross and follow
me' - that is to say, endure submissively the fate that has befallen you and obey me, God;
and no one follows him. But the first abandoned man wearing epaulets8
shoulder ornaments for military uniforms - P.R. and fit for nothing but
murder, into whose head it enters, says: 'Take, not a cross but a knapsack and rifle,
and follow me to all kinds of torment and to certain death' - and all follow him.
Having abandoned their
families, parents, wives, and children, and having been dressed up like fools and
submitted themselves to the authority of the first man of higher rank that they happened
to meet: cold, hungry, and exhausted by forced marches, they go like a herd of bullocks to
the slaughter; yet they are not bullocks but human beings. They cannot but know that they
are being driven to slaughter with the question unanswered - Why? And with despair in
their hearts they go: and die of cold, hunger, and infectious diseases, till they are
placed under a shower of bullets and cannon-balls and ordered to kill people who are
unknown to them. They slay and are slain. And no one of the slayers knows why or
wherefore. The Turks roast them alive on the fire, skin them, and tear out their entrails.
And again to-morrow someone will whistle, and again all will follow to horrible
sufferings, to death, and to obvious evil. And no one considers this hard! Neither those
who endure the sufferings, nor their fathers and mothers, consider this difficult. The
parents even themselves advise their children to go. It seems to them that not only is
this necessary and unavoidable, but that it is also good and moral.
It would be possible to
believe that the fulfilment of Christ's teaching is difficult and terrible and tormenting,
if the fulfilment of the world's teaching were easy, safe, and pleasant. But in fact the fulfilment
of the world's teaching is much more dangerous and tormenting than the fufillment of
Christ's teaching.
There used, it is said, to
be Christian martyrs, but they were the exception; they have been reckoned at 380,000 -
voluntary and involuntary, in 1800 years. But count the worldly martyrs, and for each
Christian martyr you will find a thousand worldly martyrs whose sufferings are a hundred
times more terrible. Those slain in war, during the present century, are reckoned at
thirty million.9 This book was written in 1884; and the figures
relate to the nineteenth century. - A.M.
Now these were all martyrs
to the world's teaching, who needed not even to follow the teaching of Christ but simply
to abstain from following the teaching of the world, in order to have escaped from
suffering and death.
A man need only do what he
wishes to do - refuse to go to war - he will be set to dig trenches, but will not be
tormented in Sevastopol or Plevna. A man need but disbelieve the world's teaching that he
must wear over-shoes10 The wearing of over-shoes or galoshes to keep
one's feet dry and warm and to be able on entering a house to kick them off and have clean
shoes, is here instanced as a sign of distinction from the peasant, who usually wore
nothing over his high boots. - A.M. and a watch-chain and have a
drawing-room he does not need, and that he must do all the stupid things demanded of him
by the world's teaching, and he will not be exposed to excessive toil and suffering,
never-ending cares, and work without rest or aim; he will not be deprived of intercourse
with nature, will not be deprived of congenial work, of family, and of health, and will
not perish by a senseless and tormenting death.
Christ's teaching practical and simple
It is not necessary to be
a martyr in Christ's name - that is not what he teaches. He only bids us cease to torment
ourselves in the name of the world's false teaching.
Christ's teaching has a
profound metaphysical meaning, it has an all-human meaning, and it has the simplest,
clearest, and most practical meaning for the life of every single man. That last meaning
can be expressed thus: Christ teaches men not to commit stupidities. Therein lies
the simplest meaning of Christ's teaching, accessible to all.
Christ says: Do not be
angry,11 See Sermon on the Mount, Matthew Chapters 5-7 - P.R.
do not consider anyone your inferior - to do so is stupid. If you get angry and insult
people it will be the worse for you. Christ also says: Do not run after women, but
unite with one woman and live with her - it will be better for you so. He also says: Do
not promise anything to people, or else they will oblige you to do stupid and evil
actions. He also says: Do not return evil for evil, or the evil will return to you
yet more bitterly than before: like the heavy log suspended over the store of honey,
which kills the bear.12 The reference is to the practice of hanging a
heavy block, or log, over a deposit of honey. When a bear tries to take the honey he
knocks himself against the log, which swings back and hits him. The bear then strikes more
fiercely at the log, which rebounding, strikes him still more heavily, and so on, until,
it is said, the bear is sometimes killed by the blows he receives. - A. M.
He also says: Do not consider men foreign to you merely because they live in another
country and speak another language. If you consider them as enemies and they consider
you such, it will be worse for you. So do not commit all these stupidities, and it will be
better for you.
'Yes', people reply, 'but
the world is so arranged that to resist its arrangements is more painful than to live in
accord with them. If a man refuses military service he will be sent to a fortress and
perhaps shot. If a man does not safeguard his life by acquiring the property he and his
family need, he and they will die of hunger.' So people say, trying to defend the world's
arrangement, but they do not think so themselves. They only speak so because they cannot
deny the justice of the teaching of Christ in whom they are supposed to believe, and they
must justify themselves in some way for not fulfilling that teaching. They not only do not
think this, but they have never even thought about the matter at all. They believe the
world's teaching and merely employ the excuse the Church has taught them,13
When Tolstoy says "Church" he means the established church who asserted
themselves "with oaths that they possessed the truth" - P.R. to
the effect that if one fulfils Christ's teaching one must endure great suffering; and
therefore they have never even tried to fulfil it. We see the innumerable sufferings
people endure for the sake of the world's teaching, but in our time we never see
sufferings for the sake of Christ's teaching at all. Thirty millions have perished for
the world's teaching in warfare; thousands of millions have pined in a tormenting life for
the sake of the world's teaching, while I know not only no millions, but not even
thousands or dozens, or even one single man, who has perished by death or by a painful
life of hunger and cold for the sake of Christ's teaching. It is only a ridiculous
excuse, showing to what a degree Christ's teaching is unknown to us. Not only do we not
share it, we have never even seriously considered it. The Church has been at pains to
explain Christ's teaching so that it has appeared to us not as a teaching of life but as a
bugbear.
Christ calls men to a
spring of water which is there beside them. Men are tormented by thirst, eat dirt, and
drink one another's blood, but their teachers tell them that they will perish if they go
to the spring to which Christ directs them. And people believe this; they suffer and die
of thirst at two steps from the water, not daring to go to it. But it is only necessary to
believe Christ, that he has brought blessing on earth and that he gives us who thirst a
spring of living water, and to come to him, to see how insidious is the Church's
deception and how insensate are our sufferings when salvation is so near at hand. It is only
necessary to accept Christ's teaching simply and plainly for the terrible deception in
which we all and each are living to become clear.
Life not abundance of possessions
Generation after
generation we labour to secure life by means of violence and by safeguarding our property.
Our happiness seems to us to lie in obtaining the maximum of power and the maximum of
property. We are so accustomed to this that Christ's teaching, that a man's happiness
cannot depend on his power or his estate and that a rich man cannot be happy, seems to us
like a demand to make a sacrifice for the sake of future bliss. But Christ did not think
of calling us to sacrifice; on the contrary, He teaches us not to do what is worse but
to do what is better for us here in this life. Christ, loving men, teaches them to refrain
from securing themselves by violence and by property, just as others who love men
teach them to refrain from brawling and drunkenness. He says that men, if they live
without resisting others and without property, will be happier; and by the example of his
own life he confirms this. He says that a man living in accord with his teaching must be
prepared to die at any moment by the violence of others, by cold or hunger, and cannot be
sure of a single hour's life. And we imagine this to be a terrible demand of
sacrifice; but it is only a declaration of the conditions in which every man always and
inevitably lives. Christ's disciple must be prepared at any moment for suffering and
death. But is not a disciple of the world in the same position? We are so accustomed to
our pretense that all we do for the imaginary security of our life - our armies,
fortifications, stores, clothes, and doctoring, our property and our money - seems to us
something that really and seriously secures our life. We forget, though it is obvious to
everyone, what happened to the man who planned to build barns in order to be safe for many
years. He died that same night.14 Luke 12:15-20 And He said to them,
"Take heed and beware of covetousness, for one's life does not consist in the
abundance of the things he possesses." Then He spoke a parable to them, saying:
"The ground of a certain rich man yielded plentifully. And he thought within himself,
saying, 'What shall I do, since I have no room to store my crops?' So he said, 'I will do
this: I will pull down my barns and build greater, and there I will store all my crops and
my goods. And I will say to my soul, "Soul, you have many goods laid up for many
years; take your ease; eat, drink, and be merry."' But God said to him, 'You
fool! This night your soul will be required of you; then whose will those things be which
you have provided?'"> Indeed all we do to safeguard our life is just what an
ostrich does, standing still and hiding its head in order not to see how it is being
killed. We do worse than the ostrich: doubtfully to safeguard our doubtful life in a
doubtful future, we certainly destroy our certain life in the certain present.
14 Luke 12:15-20 And He said to them,
"Take heed and beware of covetousness, for one's life does not consist in the
abundance of the things he possesses." Then He spoke a parable to them, saying:
"The ground of a certain rich man yielded plentifully. And he thought within himself,
saying, 'What shall I do, since I have no room to store my crops?' So he said, 'I will do
this: I will pull down my barns and build greater, and there I will store all my crops and
my goods. And I will say to my soul, "Soul, you have many goods laid up for many
years; take your ease; eat, drink, and be merry."' But God said to him, 'You
fool! This night your soul will be required of you; then whose will those things be which
you have provided?'"> Indeed all we do to safeguard our life is just what an
ostrich does, standing still and hiding its head in order not to see how it is being
killed. We do worse than the ostrich: doubtfully to safeguard our doubtful life in a
doubtful future, we certainly destroy our certain life in the certain present.
The deception consists in
the false conviction that our life can be secured by strife against others. We are so
accustomed to this deception - and imaginary safeguarding of our life and property - that
we do not notice all we lose by it. And we lose all - our whole life. Our whole life is
so absorbed in cares for this safeguarding of life, this preparation for life, that no
life at all is left us.
We need only discard our
habits for a moment and regard our life from outside, to see that all we do for the
supposed safeguarding of our life we really do not at all to safeguard our life, but only
to forget, by busying ourselves with these things, that life is never secure. But not only
do we deceive ourselves and spoil our real life for the sake of an imaginary one; we
generally by this effort to make ourselves safe, ruin the very thing we wish to secure.
The French armed themselves to secure their life in 1870, and in consequence of this
safeguarding hundreds of thousands of Frenchmen perished. The same is done by all nations
that arm themselves. The rich man secures his life by having money, and that very money
attracts a robber who kills him. A nervous man safeguards his life by undergoing a cure,
and the cure itself slowly kills him, or if it does not kill him certainly deprives him of
life, like that sick man who deprived himself of life for thirty-eight years, by waiting
for the angel at the pool.15 John 5:2-8
Christ's teaching that
life cannot be made safe, but that one must always, at each moment, be ready to die, is
certainly better than the world's teaching that one must secure one's life: it is better
because the inevitability of death and the insecurity of life remain the same whether one
adopts the world's teaching or that of Christ; and in Christ's teaching life itself is not
entirely absorbed in the useless occupation of pseudo-safeguarding one's life, but becomes
free and can be devoted to its one natural aim, the welfare of oneself and one's fellows.
A disciple of Christ will be poor. Yes; that is to say, he will always make use of all
those blessings which God has given him. He will not ruin his life. We have called
poverty,16 Poverty, in Russian, is bednost, from the same root as
beda, a misfortune. - A. M.> which is a happiness, by a word that indicates
misfortune, but the reality of the matter is not altered thereby. To be poor means that a
man17 Tolstoy has in mind a Russian country peasant, whom he contrasts
with a rich townsman, and the description relates to things as they were under the Tsars
in the pre-Revolutionary days. - A. M. will not live in a town but in a
village, and will not sit at home but will work in the woods or fields; will see the light
of the sun, the earth, the sky, and animals; will not consider what he can eat to arouse
his appetite and how to get his bowels to move, but will be hungry three times a day; will
not toss about on soft cushions wondering how he is to escape from sleeplessness, but will
sleep; he will have children and will live with them; will have free intercourse with all
men, and above all will not do things he does not wish to do, and will not be afraid of
what will happen to him. He will sicken, suffer, and die, as everyone does (though, to
judge by the way poor men sicken and die, it will be better for him than it is for the
rich) but he will certainly live more happily.
A man's work will feed him
'But no one will feed you
and you will die of hunger', is said in reply to this. To the objection that a man living
according to Christ's teaching will die of hunger Christ replied by one brief sentence.18
the one which is interpreted as a justification for the sloth of the clergy, Matthew
10:10; Luke 10:7 - L. T. He said:
Take no wallet for your journey,
neither two coats, nor shoes, nor staff: for the labourer is worthy of his food. In that
same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give, for the labourer is
worthy of his hire.19 Luke 10:7 |
The labourer is worthy, axioV
estin literally means: can and should have his subsistence. It is a very short saying; but
for anyone who understands it as Christ did, there can be no idea of arguing that a man
who has no property will die of hunger. To understand these words in their real meaning
one must first of all quite renounce the supposition that man's welfare consists in
idleness. One must return to the conception natural to all unperverted people, that the
necessary condition of happiness for man is not idleness, but work; that a man cannot
reject work; that not to work is dull, wearisome, and hard, as it is dull and hard for an
ant, a horse, or any other animal not to work. One must forget our savage superstition
that the position of a man with an inexhaustible purse - that is to say, with a Government
post, the ownership of land, or of bonds bearing interest, which make it possible for him
to do nothing - is a naturally happy condition. One must restore in one's imagination that
view of work which all unperverted people have, and which Christ had when he said that the
labourer was worthy of his subsistence. Christ could not imagine people who would regard
work as a curse, and therefore could not imagine a man who did not work or did not wish to
work. He always supposes that his disciples work. And therefore he says: 'If a man works,
then his work will feed him.' If another man takes the produce of this man's labour, then
the other man will feed the worker just because he reaps the advantage of his labour. And
so the worker will receive his subsistence. He will not have property, but there can be no
doubt about his subsistence.
The difference between
Christ's teaching about work and the teaching of our world lies in this, that according to
the world's teaching work is man's peculiar merit for which he keeps account with others
and considers that he has a right to the more subsistence the more he works; while
according to Christ's teaching work is a necessary condition of man's life and subsistence
is the inevitable consequence of work. Work produces food, food produces work, that is the
unending circle: the one is the consequence and the cause of the other. However evil a
master may be, he will feed his workman as he will feed the horse that works for him; and
will feed him so that the workman may produce as much as possible, in other words, can
co-operate in that which provides the welfare of man.
'The son of man came not
to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.'20
Mark 10:45 According to the teaching of Christ each individual man,
independently of what the world may be like, will have the best kind of life if he
understands that his vocation is not to demand work from others but to devote his own
life to working for others, and to give his life a ransom for many. A man who acts so,
says Christ, is worthy of his subsistence - that is to say, cannot but receive it. In a
word, man does not live that others should work for him, but that he should work for
others. Christ sets up the basis which undoubtedly ensures man's material existence,
and by the words 'The labourer is worthy of his subsistence', he sets aside that very
common objection to the possibility of fulfilling his teaching which says that a man
carrying out Christ's teaching among people who do not carry it out will perish of hunger
and cold. Christ shows us that a man ensures his subsistence not by taking it from others,
but by doing what is useful and necessary for others. The more necessary he is to
others the more safe will be his existence.
Man does not live that
others should serve him, but that he should himself serve others. He who labours will be
fed.
That is a truth confirmed
by the life of the whole world.
Till the present time,
always and everywhere, where man has worked he has obtained sustenance, as every horse
receives his feed. And such sustenance was received by the workers involuntarily, against
the grain, for they only desired to free themselves from toil, to get as much as possible,
and to seat themselves on the neck of those who were sitting on their necks. Such an
involuntary, unwilling worker, envious and angry, was not left without sustenance, and was
even more fortunate than the man who did not work but lived on the labour of others. How
much more fortunate still will he be who works according to Christ's law, and whose aim is
to work as much as he can and to take as little as possible! And how much more happy will
his position be when around him there are at least some, and perhaps even many, men like
himself, who will serve him!
Work is a necessary
condition of man's life. Work also gives welfare to man. And therefore the withholding
from others of the fruits of one's labour or of other people's labour, hinders the welfare
of man. Giving one's labour to others promotes man's happiness.
Really every man, however
he lives - whether according to Christ's teaching or to the world's - is alive only thanks
to the work of other people. Others have protected him and given him drink and fed him,
and still protect him and feed him and give him drink. But by the world's teaching man, by
violence and threats, obliges others to continue to feed him and his family. By Christ's
teaching man is equally protected, nourished, and supplied with drink by others; but in
order that others should continue to guard, to feed, and to give him drink, he does not
bring force to bear on anyone, but tries himself to serve others and to be useful to all
men as he can, and thereby he becomes necessary to all. Worldly people will always
wish to cease to feed one who is unnecessary to them and who compels them by force to feed
him, and at the first opportunity they not only cease to feed him, but kill him as
unnecessary. But all men, always, evil as they may be, will carefully feed and safeguard
one who works for them.
Conclusion
I believe that the sole
meaning of my life lies in living by that light which is within me, and in not hiding it
under a bushel but holding it high before men that they may see it. And this belief gives
me fresh strength to fulfil Christ's teaching, and destroys those hindrances which
formerly blocked my path.
A Christian knows the
truth only to show it to others, and most of all to those near him and bound to him by
ties of relationship and friendship, and a Christian can show the truth by not falling
into the error others have fallen into, by not ranging himself either on the side of the
attackers or on the side of the defenders, but by giving all to others and showing by his
life that he wants nothing except to fulfil the will of God, and that he fears nothing
except to depart from that will. A Christian cannot impart that knowledge to men
otherwise than by refraining from the error in which those dwell who do him evil, and by
returning good for evil. And that alone is the whole business of a Christian's life, and
its whole meaning, which death cannot destroy.
In which way then is it
safer, more reasonable, and more joyous to live: according to the world's teaching or
according to Christ's?
|